Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Jay Z Named in Reparations Lawsuit


The New York Observer is reporting that a Brooklyn activist has filed a $5 Billion dollar reparations lawsuit against Bruce Ratner, Barclays and Jay-Z. The suit claims that there should be a lien on their property and that the funds should go toward reparations.

The three defendants in the lawsuit are connected through an interest in the Atlantic Yards Project, taking place in Brooklyn. Ratner is planning to build 6,000 apartments and a new arena for the New Jersey Nets.

Campbell, in his lawsuit, claimed that Barclays and Jay-Z, working together, "profited from the African Slave Trade and continue to profit from these gains, through a conspiracy dating back hundreds of years and continue to date to oppress black people, enslave them, [and] unlawfully deport them to all corners of the Earth."


Campbell's group is called Da Black Defense League and they originally filed their suit back in October. Ratner's group has dismissed the lawsuit as being without merit.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Aretha Franklin Gets Angry with Beyonce


Beyonce and Aretha Franklin apparently don't see eye-to-eye over the use of the word "queen". During the Grammys, Aretha got a little unnerved over the fact that Beyonce introduced Tina Turner as "the queen".

Aretha, known as the Queen of Soul, apparently felt that the use of the word to describe Tina Turner was a slap in her face.

"I am not sure of whose toes I may have stepped on or whose ego I may have bruised between the Grammy writers and Beyonce," Franklin said in a statement issued by her publicist. "However, I dismissed it as a cheap shot for controversy."

Beyonce's father, Matthew Knowles, told CelebTV that the whole situation was ridiculous. "I am not taking something this ridiculous to Beyonce. Beyonce referred to Tina Turner as a 'queen.' Not queen of gospel, queen of soul, queen of blues, Queen of England. I consider my wife a queen and sometimes call her that. Does Aretha have a problem with that?"

Neither side is responding to media requests for comment.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Was Tavis Smiley Dissing Barack Obama?



by Valencia Roner (contentblackwoman.blogspot.com)

I can recall when Tavis Smiley first came on the radio. I remember how excited I was to hear such an intelligent brother give such solid commentary on the conditions of our community with eloquence and insight. His brilliance was undeniable.

Fast forward several years later. I would get to my office of my very own business sometimes as early at 4 a.m. to listen to the NPR archived broadcast of Tavis' daily shows. He had such great guests and I knew there would always be great dialogue.

For about 10 years, it was not unusual for me to listen to his commentaries online of the Tom Joyner Morning Show. I listened for years because I always perceived that whatever the topic or call to action would be, it would be done in love for the love of Black people.

When Senator Barack Obama first announced he was running for President, not once - not even for a second - did I believe that every Black person in America would fall in lock step to vote for him. And you know what, that was alright with me. I've always said that the beauty of this campaign was that just maybe the American media would finally figure out that we as Black people are not a monolith. We all have varied views and perspectives - and this is alright. This is what helps make the world go round and what's great about living in America.

Then Tavis began making commentaries intended to ensure that we as Black America were awake to the issues of this particular election cycle by admonishing us to hold whoever is elected president in '08 accountable. There were passionate cries for accountability.

However, it quickly became apparent that tone and delivery were becoming an issue. It began to unnerve some of Smiley's most faithful fans. There were cries for unity and to just give peace - and the brother (meaning Obama) - a chance. But somehow, in the growing opinion of others, it appeared that Smiley wasn't even giving Obama a chance and people grew frustrated, hurt and angry. The perception was how can a bright Black man do this to another bright Black man?

This morning, the morning Smiley was scheduled to make it known who had not confirmed to attend his annual State of the Black Union, we got a very different and subdued Tavis Smiley on the Tom Joyner Morning Show. He started his commentary by saying, "What does it mean to be a free Black man or a a free Black woman?" It was a question he repeated several times during his 9 minutes or so of commentary.

I set my alarm clock for 5:15 a.m. PST just so I could get up to listen live to it on my computer.

Smiley shared that to be a free Black man or a free Black woman sometimes mean that there is a price to pay, a burden to bear and a cross to carry to hold on to the spirit of one's convictions. He went on to discuss that it sometimes takes "courage, care and commitment" to love Black people and that the State of the Black Union was intended to allow a space for those to think critically.

He said much more without directly addressing the controversy at hand. However, the thing that jumped out the most was his comment that we - as a community - are lacking a love language; so much so, that some folks are getting death threats. "Lord, my God, has it come to this?" I thought.

He ended his commentary by saying to thine ownself be true.

I felt Smiley's commentary this morning. I felt it deep.

While I cannot say for sure if Smiley took his "big boy" pill this morning, it sounded like it. He sounded strong. There most certainly wasn't putting anybody "on blast" - I know that.

Just the other day in a radio interview with Spike Lee, Chicago WVON's Santita Jackson stressed that we must "elevate the tone of the conversation" when it comes to expressing our differences and our preferences in debating our views on the issues and the candidates in this election cycle. Wiser words have rarely been spoken.

We must elevate the tone of the conversation to ensure substantive debate. We can disagree without being disagreeable.

As brilliant a figure as Smiley is, he and we didn't have to be in this place this morning. It wasn't necessary. No one declared war on us. A Black man just decided to run for President of the United States. That's it.

However, when a harsh tone is perceived to be used unnecessarily - conventional wisdom of those in the public eye dictates one must always be mindful of the public relations consequences. Debate can be encouraged without coming off as being on the attack. And while that may have not been the intention, just because the voice of the masses have been raised without it's normal leader doesn't mean they are all wrong. Sometimes we just have to admit there has been a miscalculation in the anticipated response and make the necessary adjustments.

Such adjustments can be made without the compromise of values.

A friend of mine told me the other day that while she loves her husband, she just wishes he would be more mindful of his tone. It isn't what he says, but how he says it.

We can be loved and led without being harsh with and to one another. We aren't children, but free thinking humans with the capability of thinking critically for ourselves. We deserve to be treated that way. And karma dictates that we get what we give.

So, with that, I have a suggestion. Let's begin again. Let's start over. Let's have a do over. Our households and our community cannot afford an "us against them" mentality. We have too much work to do. Our schools are in need of repair. We need affordable access to quality healthcare. We need communities that are thriving economically. We have too much work to do.

Remember, love still wins.

And while in order to lead the people, you have to love the people, sometimes we have to remember to lead them lovingly.

Valencia Roner runs the blog: contentblackwoman.blogspot.com.

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Big Shaq Traded to the Phoenix Suns


"The Daddy" has been moved. Shaquille O'neal, long-time NBA superstar and dominant center, has been traded to the Phoenix Suns. The deal comes as a surprise, as the once great O'neal has reached the sunset of his career.

The Suns acquired O'neal in exchange for Shawn Marion and Marcus Banks. The Suns gain a stronger inside presence and a seasoned veteran, but not the dominant player that O'neal once was.

O'neal didn't talk to reporters when he arrived in Phoenix, but the crowd gave him the same kind of warm welcome he received when he went to Miami. He didn't make the open promise that he would win a championship (as he did when he arrived in Miami), but he did point to the ring on his finger and give a thumbs up. This made the crowd go wild.

The chances that O'neal could lead the Suns to a title are not as great as they once were. However, it is not out of the question. O'neal has brought championship caliber performance everywhere he has gone, since his days with The Orlando Magic, LA Lakers and finally, the Miami Heat. Should O'neal choose to step up his performance, a title may be in the works for his new team as well.

O'neal has recently been out with a hip injury and had an MRI on Tuesday.

"I'm well aware that I'm on the line," Suns General Manager Steve Kerr said. "That's my job. That's why I'm sitting in this seat."

Over 16 years, Shaquille O'neal has averaged 25.6 points and 11.5 rebounds. This year, has has only averaged 14.2 points and he is dealing with a highly publicized divorce off the court. He was also not selected to the All-Star team for the first time in 14 years.

"We have to move on with our team," Miami president and coach Pat Riley said. "This is not the most desirable place to be right now."

O'neal is set to earn $20 million per season for the next two years.